Karen,
I'm sorry, I completely missed this reply when it first arrive and just saw it now.
It's a good point - my quick, short answer would be that I have no real preference.
The most common application that I personally see for the mode combine is producing sky flats. Unless you're unlucky, observe densely packed regions of space, or simply aren't taking enough exposures, the sky values should be the most represented.
Perhaps, if you were combining some images and a star fell on the same pixels in 10 out of 20 images, then you might get 10 star values and 10 sky values, so two peaks. In this case, I would expect the star peak to be narrow and the sky peak to be broader. In that case, is there any way to (relatively easily) look at the neighboring values for each peak, and choose the broadest of the peaks?
Best,
Scott
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |