Is ACP correctly putting BJD in fits? And use or not the _MOBS?

Posted by gboyle on Aug 14, 2017; 5:21pm
URL: http://astroimagej.170.s1.nabble.com/Is-ACP-correctly-putting-BJD-in-fits-And-use-or-not-the-MOBS-tp746.html

HI
ACP version 8.1 now puts additional fields in fits, including BJD and other time/airmass figures.
They seem to be in there when I look at them when the files come out of ACP but when I process in AIJ and open the measurements table in AIJ these fields show "NaN" until I update the fields using the co-ordinate converter function.
Is there something wrong with the ACP values or do I need to change something so that they are read correctly - am just looking to take advantage of the automation and limit manual processes where available!

Also should I be using BJD or BJD_MOBS - am not sure what the latter is..!

Thanks
Gavin