Object designation R.A. Decl. V Offsets Motion/hr Orbit Further observations? h m s ° ' " R.A. Decl. R.A. Decl. Comment (Elong/Decl/V at date 1) (18175) Jenniferchoy 23 59 43.9 +00 05 07 19.9 4.0W 5.1N 46+ 21+ 18o None needed at this time. (7529) Vagnozzi 00 00 34.3 -00 01 32 18.5 8.6E 1.5S 62+ 24+ 20o None needed at this time. (38038) 1998 RQ19 00 00 26.2 -00 08 16 19.7 6.5E 8.3S 43+ 18+ 15o None needed at this time.
Regards,
Ferran
Hi Karen,
Thank you for your interest in solar system moving objects.
1) It is possible to find if the object is in the image (previously solving astrometrically, i.e. WCS included) using MPCORB.dat file from the Minor Planet Center web page http://www.minorplanetcenter.net/iau/MPCORB.html the problem with this is that this file must be updated to include the latest minor planet objects. It is also needed to compute the coordinates of the object for the given date (using the orbital elements included in MPCORB.dat) in order to find the object in the image. In summary, you should add your own ephemeris code or integrator.
2) It is also possible to get the proper motion of an object for a given date using MPC ephemeris http://www.minorplanetcenter.net/iau/MPEph/MPEph.html or JPL-HORIZONS system http://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/horizons.cgi#top or any other ephemeris application. Usually the units for the proper motion of solar system objects are expressed in arcsec/hr or arcsec/min, but it is really easy (using the resolution of the image) to convert this speed to pixels/hr or pixels/min.
Of these two options the 1st one is the most difficult to program, but it would allow the automatic detection (and track) of the object in the (WCS solved) images. The 2nd one is the most direct to be programmed, but needs to identify the object and provide its proper motion. The 2nd one can be enough at this stage, and latter (with more time) perhaps you can think in adding the most automatic one.
The option you propose (click the moving object in 2 consecutive images to compute the proper motion in arcsecs or pixels) is also a good idea, but perhaps is easiest to program the 2nd option...any of these options added to the Multi-Aperture macro would be OK in order to do AIJ more useful for the minor planet community.
Thanks a lot Karen!
If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:http://astroimagej.1065399.n5.nabble.com/Perform-differential-photometry-on-an-object-moving-across-a-field-tp240p323.htmlTo start a new topic under How to accomplish specific tasks in AstroImageJ, email [hidden email]
To unsubscribe from AstroImageJ, click here.
NAML
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |